Lady Justice taken from a low angle

Dallas County jury faults Ford Motor Co. for rollover crash

MONTGOMERY, ALA. (February 15, 2019) – A Dallas County, Alabama, jury found defendant Ford Motor Company at fault for a rollover crash of a 1998 Ford Explorer that left Travaris “Tre” Smith paralyzed, and awarded Smith $151,791,000. The award included $51,791,000 in compensatory damages and $100 million in punitive damages.

Explorer Failed Ford’s Own Safety Guidelines

The jury agreed with Smith in finding that Ford failed to meet its own safety guidelines for the Explorer’s rollover resistance requirement, and attempted to cover up the vehicle’s defective design.

“Tre had the misfortune of riding in a vehicle Ford knew could and did hurt him, but the jury’s verdict will allow him to reclaim some level of hope for a better future, with less dependence on others. Ford failed Tre and so many other consumers. The jurors in Dallas County held Ford accountable for yet another tragedy in a decades-long saga of the company’s efforts to cover up the shoddy design and its refusal to adequately address the problems.”

— LaBarron Boone, Principal

Prone to Rollovers

In August 2015, Smith was a passenger in the 1998 Ford Explorer traveling in Dallas County. The driver swerved to miss an animal that appeared to be crossing in the vehicle’s path. The swerve caused the driver to lose control of the vehicle. This action is called an accident avoidance maneuver.

The Explorer’s design is prone to rolling over, especially during these emergencies, rather than sliding out like similar vehicles. The Explorer carrying Smith rolled over two times before landing on the shoulder of the road, right side up.

Smith fell unconscious and his spine snapped as the vehicle was rolling over. The injury left him paralyzed and forever changed his life.

“We represent a 24-year-old young man who cannot be left alone to care for himself in any way. This verdict represents justice for Tre and his family. Thanks to a courageous jury he will now be able to access basic necessities within his home and have access to the care he needs.”

— Kendall Dunson, Principal

“Ford should have spent money redesigning this dangerous SUV model rather than paying huge amounts to defend the cases. One expert has been paid over $75 million over the last 16 years to defend Ford in accidents like Mr. Smith’s.”

— Greg Allen, Lead Products Liability Attorney

Ford’s Shameful Coverup

Boone believes jurors also intended to send a message to Ford that destroying safety documents in an effort to hide critical and unfavorable evidence will not be tolerated.

The 1998 Ford Explorer has been at the center of two historic safety recalls in the U.S. due to its defective design. The model consistently failed the Consumer Union testing because of its propensity to roll over, and company engineers advised Ford it needed to change the design, but Ford refused.

Instead, the company opted to change the product’s testing method. Ford moved tests from a real-world setting to a computer-based simulation called ADAMS. Yet, Ford destroyed the original input and output data obtained through the ADAMS testing, claiming it had no scientific value and was too expensive to maintain.

“We have seen bad conduct before but the egregiousness of Ford’s scheme to mislead the jury was stunning. Ford claimed the ADAMS data that would have proved the safety of this vehicle was destroyed because it had no scientific value and was too expensive to maintain. We provided proof that something as basic as a $100 thumb drive could have easily preserved the data.”

— LaBarron Boone, Principal

At trial, Plaintiffs also explained that in its efforts to resist redesigning the Explorer, Ford altered less expensive components such as air pressure and tire sizes but to no avail. The defective design remains in the stream of commerce decades later and continues to seriously injure and kill consumers.

Case Information

Beasley Allen lawyers LaBarron Boone, Greg Allen, Kendall Dunson, Dan Philyaw and Stephanie Monplaisir, along with Bill Gamble of Gamble, Gamble, Calame and Jones, LLC represented Smith.

The case is Travaris D. Smith v. Ford Motor Company, et al, 27-CV-2016-900273.00 in the Circuit Court of Dallas County, Alabama.

Related News

WSFA-TV12 – AL man paralyzed in crash awarded $151 million in lawsuit against Ford Motor Company
Montgomery Advertiser – Selma man awarded $151M in Ford rollover lawsuit
WHNT19 – Selma man paralyzed in crash awarded $151 million
Selma Times Journal – Dallas County jury faults Ford Motor Co. for 2015 rollover crash
WAFF48 – AL man paralyzed in crash awarded $151 million in lawsuit against Ford Motor Company
The National Trial Lawyers – NTL member LaBarron Boone helps secure $151M in Ford Explorer rollover trial
WSFA -TV12 – Alabama man reacts after $151M verdict against Ford
Daily Report – Jury Awards $151M in Ford Rollover Trial

Free Case Evaluation

“Helping those who need it most” is our motto, and we are here to assist you.
You pay us nothing if we do not win for you.

"*" indicates required fields

Are you an attorney?
For Disclaimers, see our Terms of Use.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.