Navigating Negligent Security & Premises Liability
In today’s world, safety is a paramount concern for everyone. Whether you’re visiting a shopping mall, staying at a hotel, visiting a pharmacy, or attending a concert, you expect the premises to be secure. However, when property owners fail to provide adequate security, it can lead to serious injuries or even fatalities. This is where the concepts of negligent security and premises liability come into play.
While the laws vary from state to state, Beasley Allen’s premises liability lawyers are actively investigating and litigating these cases where severe injury or death results.
What is Premises Liability?
Premises liability holds property owners responsible for ensuring their premises are safe for visitors. The owner can be held liable if someone gets injured because the property wasn’t maintained properly. This responsibility includes preventing foreseeable dangers, such as criminal acts like shootings, fights, stabbings, or other forms of violence, including sexual assault.
Understanding Negligent Security
Negligent security is a part of premises liability that focuses on the failure to provide proper security measures. This can include not having enough security personnel, poor lighting, broken locks, or inadequate surveillance systems. When these failures lead to crimes like assaults or robberies, the property owner can be held responsible.
Victims of negligent security or unsafe premises have the right to seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, property damage, and for the wrongful death of a loved one. To make a successful negligent security claim, the injured person must prove four key elements:
- Duty of Care: The property owner had a legal obligation to ensure a safe environment.
- Breach of Duty: The owner did not fulfill this obligation by failing to provide adequate security.
- Causation: The lack of security was a cause of the plaintiff’s injury.
- Damages: The plaintiff suffered actual harm or losses because of the incident.
Foreseeability is another critical factor in negligent security cases. Courts often look at whether there were previous, similar crimes in the same area that the property owner knew about or should have known about. For example, if there were five shootings in a mall parking lot before the incident in question, the latest shooting would likely be considered foreseeable. Courts also consider how often law enforcement has been called to the property, whether past crimes were violent or had the potential to be violent, how close in time the previous crimes were to the incident in question, and whether the property owner made any effort to protect customers from these events.
Meet Our Negligent Security Attorneys
No post found!
Related News
Negligent Security & Precautions to Prevent Sexual Assaults
Business and property owners have a responsibility to ensure the safety of everyone on their…
The Risk With Rentals: Negligent Security Suits On The Rise
During the pandemic, the short-term rental industry saw a massive boom as hotels closed their…
Fun Turned Fatal: Lawsuit Filed After Deadly Buckhead Shooting
Nightclub Nightmare- In the heart of Atlanta’s vibrant nightlife, a senseless tragedy unfolded. The Elleven45…
Georgia Cases Show Need, Benefit of Negligent Security Laws
Our Atlanta-based lawyers often handle apartment complex negligent security claims. They say negligent security laws…
Lawsuit Filed After Teen Fatally Shot at Georgia Apartments
Mom alleges Forest Cove apartment complex owners and management failed to address dangers to residents…
$26 Million Settlement in Georgia Wrongful Death Shooting Case
A young mother and her unborn child were killed by stray bullets at her Georgia…
