Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder

Johnson and Johnson ordered to pay $325 Million in Talc Mesothelioma Case

Recently, a New York State jury awarded a woman $325 million in damages, finding Johnson & Johnson’s talc-containing products were contaminated with asbestos and contributed to her mesothelioma. The verdict is one of the highest talc verdicts in the country to date, totaling $25 million in compensatory damages and $300 million in punitive damages.

The verdict comes more than two years after the commencement of litigation against the company’s talc products. The New York case involved 66-year-old Donna Olson and her husband. It was alleged that Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products contained asbestos and that Mrs. Olson’s consistent use of these products consequently caused her mesothelioma, which is a rare, fatal form of cancer. Mesothelioma is directly linked to asbestos exposure. Mrs. Olson testified that she used Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder beginning at the age of 8 until 1984, frequently creating a “cloud” when she would apply the products as part of her daily routine.

A highly publicized and widely disseminated Reuters article released in December 2018 revealed the presence of asbestos in talc, which has been used in Johnson & Johnson products for decades. The article also exposed the company’s knowledge of the contaminant in their products.

Johnson and Johnson Faces Over 14,000 Talc Lawsuits

Currently, the consumer goods giant is facing more than 14,000 lawsuits that allege its talcum powder products caused mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. However, the company continues to deny that its products contain asbestos and maintains they are safe for public use and consumption. The New York verdict marks the 10th favorable verdict for talc Plaintiffs in the two years since the litigation has commenced.

Asbestos is a mineral that is mined from the earth, just as talc, and the two are naturally found near each other. Talc can become easily contaminated with asbestos during the mining process. Asbestos was used for a variety of consumer and industrial products. Unfortunately, the United States does not have a total, current ban on asbestos.

The Olsons are represented by Jerome Block of Levy Konigsberg LLP and Christian Hartley, Suzanne Ratcliffe and Margaret Samadi of Maune Raichle Hartley French & Mudd LLC. The case is Donna A. Olson et al. v. Brenntag North America Inc. et al., (case number 190328/2017) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York.

Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawyers

Beasley Allen is proud to represent clients diagnosed with mesothelioma and asbestos-related diseases. For more information about this case, or asbestos litigation in general, contact Beasley Allen via our contact form below.

This story appears in the July 2019 issue of The Jere Beasley Report. You may read more online or click here to subscribe.

Free Case Evaluation

Since 1979, Beasley Allen has been committed to “helping those who need it most.” Our attorneys have helped thousands of clients get the justice they desperately needed and deserved. You pay us nothing if we do not win for you. Contact us today for a free case evaluation.

For Disclaimers, see our Terms of Use.

Free Case Evaluation Full - Updated

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.