The Supreme Court agreed Monday, Dec. 6 that it will hear an appeal by Wal-Mart regarding one of the largest employment discrimination cases in U.S. history. The lawsuit, Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes, No. 10-277, was originally filed in 2001 and alleges Wal-Mart discriminated against hundreds of thousands of women in both pay and promotion.

Wal-Mart has disputed the validity of the lawsuit proceeding as a class-action, saying there are too many plaintiffs with too many different circumstances to qualify for class status. However, in April, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco ruled 6-to-5 that the case could proceed as a class-action.

The Supreme Court ruling gives Wal-Mart another chance to plead its case against qualifying the lawsuit as a class-action, and could have repercussions on other class-action suits, including categories of antitrust, securities and product liability.

Lawyers for Wal-Mart say the Plaintiffs do not have enough in common to make a class action appropriate, as they were employed in more than 3,400 stores throughout the country.

Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in this case argue the class is large naturally because Wal-Mart is the nation’s largest employer and “manages its operations and employment practices in a highly uniform and centralized manner.” They assert, as do other civil-rights groups, that a class-action suit is the best way to make businesses stop discriminatory practices.

Arguments are expected to be heard this spring, and a decision handed down by the end of June.

Sources: New York Times; The Washington Post


We're here to help!

We live by our creed of “helping those who need it most” and have helped thousands of clients get the justice they desperately needed and deserved. If you feel you have a case or just have questions please contact us for a free consultation. There is no risk and no fees unless we win for you.

Fields marked * may be required for submission.

A positive manner

Several years ago my brother and sister -in-law were in a terrible car accident. My sister in-law was paralyzed from her neck down. Beasley Allen handled the case for my brother to see to it that my sister-in-law received the proper and necessary care she needed. I appreciate the attorneys and staff of Beasley Allen in handling this matter quickly and in a positive manner. Good job Beasley Allen!!