Supreme Court ruling in BP oil spill litigation explained by Beasley Allen’s John Tomlinson on WSFA

| Toxic Exposure, Environmental Disasters

On Dec. 8, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear petitions from BP seeking to overturn its multibillion dollar settlement for claims resulting from its 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Beasley Allen lawyer John Tomlinson sat down with WSFA’s Sally Pitts to explain what this means for people harmed by the oil spill who have been waiting for compensation. Tomlinson said BP’s argument against the settlement agreement – which the oil giant itself helped to craft and approved – boils down to “the biggest case of buyer’s remorse I’ve ever seen.” Basically, he says, the cost of the settlement began to exceed BP’s estimates, and it began to scramble for a reason to get out of its obligation. There are objective, transparent formulas for compensating those harmed by the BP oil spill, which the Supreme Court ultimately upheld. “It is a huge victory for people of the Gulf Coast.” The settlement is uncapped, and the claims center will move forward with processing claims. There are still six months to file claims in the settlement process.

John Tomlinson, Beasley Allen Attorney
John Tomlinson

John is working on cases involving leukemia related to benzene exposure.


We're here to help!

We live by our creed of “helping those who need it most” and have helped thousands of clients get the justice they desperately needed and deserved. If you feel you have a case or just have questions please contact us for a free consultation. There is no risk and no fees unless we win for you.

Fields marked * may be required for submission.

Impressed with the Beasley Allen staff

I am very impressed with the Beasley Allen staff. They were very courteous and patiently explained the aspects of my claim in a way I could understand. If I ever have any need of an attorney in the future I will turn to Beasley Allen.

—Philip