Nursing home arbitration rule in limbo, leaving victims without justiceA study commissioned by the American Health Care Association, the largest trade association for the country’s nursing home industry, showed that when nursing home disputes are settled through arbitration, they are 35 percent lower than when residents take their claims before a judge or jury, according to the Des Moines Register. It is no wonder the industry is fighting to roll back a rule announced last year by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that would have blocked federally funded nursing homes from demanding residents and their families sign arbitration agreements, relinquishing their Constitutional right to go to court over alleged abuse.

As part of the admitting process, nursing homes often exploit a resident or their caregiver at a time when the need for care is critical and urgent. Forced arbitration agreements are included as part of an extensive contract. Some consumers may not realize the arbitration clause exists or what it is asking them to give up. Others, faced with stress due to emotional turmoil as well as limited time and alternatives, yield to the pressure of signing away their rights.

The CMS rule, as Beasley Allen has previously discussed, was part of a 713-page document that revamped nursing home care standards, rules and regulations. The changes are to be implemented in three phases and the first phase, which included implementing the ban on arbitration clauses, began last November. Yet, the nursing home industry has been fighting the rule since its inception including filing a federal lawsuit a month before the rule was to take effect, National Public Radio notes.

That’s right. The American Health Care Association, the industry’s leading lobbying organization, and other groups “filed a lawsuit challenging the federal government’s authority to tell the industry it can’t block people from [doing the same thing],” the LA Times explains.

Earlier this summer, Judge Michael P. Mills, in the Northern District of Mississippi, temporarily blocked the CMS rule, holding that it could not be enforced until further evidence was taken, according to the Jere Beasley Report. CMS defended the rule saying that arbitration agreements in nursing homes were clearly unfair to residents and their family members.

However, the change in administrations was accompanied by an about-face from CMS. The agency withdrew the rule in favor of nursing homes rather than the health and safety of residents. It proposed a much weaker alternative rule that once again allows nursing homes to make admittance contingent upon signing an arbitration agreement.

The nursing home industry argues that arbitration is more effective for all parties involved in a dispute. But that is not so, according to a New York Times commentary by Richard Cordray, who heads the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The CFPB is a government agency created after the 2008 financial crises to protect consumers. The agency has studied mandatory arbitration and recently created a rule blocking companies from denying consumers the option to go to court when they are treated unfairly. The research indicates “that group lawsuits help consumers recover money they otherwise would forfeit” while protecting other consumers “by halting and deterring harmful behavior.”

Following CMS’ reversal on the rule, 31 U.S. senators sent a letter to CMS Administrator Seema Verma voicing their opposition to CMS’ rollback of the rule. Other lawmakers like Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) believe “[t]he nursing home industry should do a better job of following the law,” but has refused to join the efforts to protect nursing home residents’ safety and Constitutional rights.

CMS allowed the public to weigh in on the rule, according to AARP, and more than 1,000 comments were filed. CMS has not indicated when it will issue a final rule, though. In the meantime, the rule remains in limbo with the deck stacked against some of the most vulnerable consumers in the country.

* * *

If you need more information on nursing home litigation contact Chris Boutwell, at 800-898-2034 or by email at Chris handles nursing home litigation for our firm, and he will be glad to talk with you.

Visit Oct. 10 for another installment in our Nursing Home Series.

Des Moines Register
Beasley Allen
National Public Radio
LA Times
Jere Beasley Report (December 2016)
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

We're here to help!

We live by our creed of "helping those who need it most" and have helped thousands of clients get the justice they desperately needed and deserved. If you feel you have a case or just have questions please contact us for a free consultation. There is no risk and no fees unless we win for you.

Fields marked    may be required for submission.
  1. I'm an attorney

Alabama nursing home robbed 87-year-old nun of justice...

Arbitration agreements force consumers to surrender their constitutional right to a trial by jury with...

Nursing home industry fights Florida’s life-saving...

Following Hurricane Irma, the Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills lost power for several days with...

Protecting loved ones in nursing homes

Long-term care facilities, including nursing homes, are rife with abuse and neglect and alarmingly high...

Natural disasters expose nursing home abuse and neglect

Two high-profile nursing home incidents that occurred in different states during the recent hurricanes...

Federal auditors: nursing home abuse and neglect...

Auditors realized a pattern that indicated a breakdown in the system designed to protect nursing home...

U.S. nursing home industry fails to protect residents...

Auditors for the OIG found that skilled nursing facilities or nursing homes failed or refused to report...

Continuing the battle with Big Pharma

The entire Beasley Allen staff had our personal interest at heart. We were part of the family of a down to earth, trustworthy, understanding law firm. Thank you, Beasley Allen, for continuing the battle with Big Pharma.