Gov. Bob Riley said Friday it probably wouldn’t do any good to ask the Alabama Supreme Court to reconsider its 8-1 decision throwing out nearly all of a $3.6 billion judgment the state won against Exxon Mobil.

Riley said he would talk to the state’s attorneys before making a decision but he indicated it’s unlikely the justices would change their minds in the lopsided decision.

"With a 8-1 verdict, why would you continue that?" he told reporters while in the Mobile area for the groundbreaking for a steel plant.

Exxon Mobil attorney Dave Boyd has the same view as Riley.

"We believe any further review will result in the same decision," he said Thursday night.

Jere Beasley, a Montgomery lawyer who was part of the state’s legal team, said the state has no appeal options other than asking for the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision.

"In my opinion this winds it up if they don’t grant rehearing, " he said Friday.

Alabama won the $3.6 billion judgment in 2003 in a lawsuit accusing Exxon Mobile of intentionally underpaying royalties due the state from natural gas wells drilled in state owned waters along Gulf Coast.

The Supreme Court ruled there was no proof of fraud by Exxon Mobil and threw out all punitive damages, which made up most of the judgment. The states highest court left the $51.9 million in compensatory damages, plus interest to be determined later.

Attorneys said the interest payments could end up pushing the final amount to about $100 million.

In the Supreme Courts decision, it said the way the state conservation department interpreted some payments due by Exxon Mobil was correct. That will result in Exxon Mobil having to make more payments to the state, plus interest, from the time of the trial to the present. Attorneys said that will be millions on top of the compensatory damages, but they were not immediately sure how many.

Whatever the amount, it’s still far short of what former state Conservation Commissioner Jim Martin hoped the state would get when he started auditing Exxon Mobil’s royalty payments to the conservation department in 1996. Those audits led to the state lawsuits.

We're here to help!

We live by our creed of "helping those who need it most" and have helped thousands of clients get the justice they desperately needed and deserved. If you feel you have a case or just have questions please contact us for a free consultation. There is no risk and no fees unless we win for you.

Fields marked    may be required for submission.
  1. I'm an attorney

Judge Sides with Exxon in Payment Dispute with State

The billions that state officials had once coveted from the largest jury verdict in Alabama history is...

Another Voice on the Exxon Case

A recent editorial appeared in the Montgomery Independent dealing with the court's ruling in favor of...

Jim Martin Speaks Out on Exxon

Jim Martin, who served as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources...

High Court Nullifies Exxon Jury Verdict

The Alabama Supreme Court, by tossing nearly 99 percent of a $3.6 billion verdict against ExxonMobil,...

Exxon Juror Laments Decision

The Alabama Supreme Court has slapped the citizens of Alabama in the face with their corporate-loyal...

State Supreme Court Ruling May Put Freeze on...

The state Legislature may not have as much money to open up programs they wanted after the Alabama Court...

Number one firm

I really appreciate the law firm, they look into every detail, they review everything with you not just once but several times to make sure everything is correct. They are a very good law firm and I would highly recommend them. They'll always call you back when you call with questions. They're number one in my book.