PEAT, Inc. v Vanguard Research Inc., U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D.

Ala., No. CV 99-BE-2553-NE, July 30, 2002.

PEAT, Inc., developed a unique technology for using plasma energy to destroy hazardous wastes. In 1997, PEAT entered into an agreement with Vanguard Research Inc., a government contractor, providing that PEAT would design and build plasma waste destruction-systems and Vanguard would market the systems to its clients. PEAT and Vanguard also agreed that Vanguard would not use or disclose PEAT’s proprietary technology for any purpose other than to market the systems to potential customers.

Vanguard secured two government contracts to provide waste systems using PEAT’s technology. After PEAT completed the first system, Vanguard built the second system using PEAT’s technology. Vanguard continued to market PEAT’s technology and presented itself as having an unrestricted license to market and use the technology.

PEAT brought suit for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. A jury awarded plaintiff about $10.93 million, including $8.8 million in punitive damages.

Plaintiff’s experts were Thomas Eddy, plasma pyrolysis, Idaho Falls, Idaho; Robert Kirldand, plasma pyrolysis, Starkville, Miss.; Richard Lindsey, plasma pyrolysis, Brentwood, Tenn.; and Dave Borden, finances, Montgomery, Ala.

Plaintiff’s Counsel

• Jere L.Beasley,

• Rhon E. Jones,

• Benjarnin H. Albritton, all of Montgomery, Ala.



We're here to help!

We live by our creed of “helping those who need it most” and have helped thousands of clients get the justice they desperately needed and deserved. If you feel you have a case or just have questions please contact us for a free consultation. There is no risk and no fees unless we win for you.

Fields marked * may be required for submission.


Lawyers and staff continue to help me

I suffered from an allergic reaction to a common medication causing permanent injury when I was 15 years old. My settlement allows me to take care of myself instead of being on disability. Even after my case was over, the lawyers and staff continue to help me.

—Tamika