Florida judge finds Ford deceived court in sudden acceleration trial

posted on:
July 25, 2011

author:
Staff

ford motor credit Florida judge finds Ford deceived court in sudden acceleration trialFord Motor Company defrauded the court, lied to federal regulators, and covered up decades of evidence linking sudden unintended acceleration incidents to electromagnetic interference, a Florida judge said. Senior Judge William T. Swigert of the Fifth Judicial Circuit in Sumter County, Florida, threw out a jury verdict favoring Ford in a sudden-acceleration lawsuit and ordered a new trial in which the jury would only determine compensatory and punitive damages for Peggy Stimpson, who was permanently paralyzed in a Ford Aerostar crash, and her family.

Ms. Stimpson received debilitating injuries on October 28, 2003, when the 1991 Aerostar driven by her husband shot out of their carport and raced more than 100 feet before crashing into a utility pole.

According to a report by Strategic Research & Strategies Inc. (SRS), Judge Swigert issued his 51-page decision, berating Ford for “systematically concealing a long history, stretching back to the 1970s, of studying the problem of electromagnetic interference and unintended acceleration … lying to NHTSA, systematically destroying field technical reports that identified electromagnetic interference with the cruise control servo as a cause of unintended acceleration and misleading its own experts, who have repeatedly testified in other cases that driver error had to be the cause of such events.”

SRS also notes that Judge Swigert “rapped Ford’s Counsel … for accusing the Stimpson’s attorney of lying and withholding the results of expert witness tests conducted to show what caused the tire marks left by the Stimpson’s Aerostar as it rocketed out of the carport. Both sides agreed that testimony regarding the tests would not be introduced, since they had not been recorded. But at trial, Ford’s attorney brought them up in a cross-examination and in his closing arguments, suggesting that the results had been withheld from the jury because they were unfavorable to the Stimpsons’ theory of the case.” The jurors subsequently ruled in favor of Ford despite all of these distortions.

Judge Swigert also attacked the integrity of a book that automakers, including Ford, have hid behind for many years in sudden acceleration trials. First released in 1989, An Examination of Sudden Acceleration effectively pins sudden acceleration events on driver error. In light of Ford’s knowledge about the electronic causes of sudden acceleration incidents, the judge found this sudden-acceleration bible to be “based on false information and untested assumptions for which no empirical evidence exists.”

Source:
SafetyResearch.net

Free Legal Consultation
At Beasley Allen, there is never a fee for legal services, unless we collect for you. Contact us today by filling out a brief questionnaire, or by calling our toll free number, 1-800-898-2034, for a free, no-cost no-obligation evaluation of your case.
back to top