The majority of False Claims Act (FCA) cases involve health care or military contracts; however, the FCA is both able and beginning to be used by a more diverse range of industries, which now includes academic research. Allegedly, Duke University has submitted fraudulent data in applications for more than 60 grants, worth more than $200 million.

The issue began with a researcher working in the lab of a prominent pulmonary scientist at Duke. When the researcher, Erin Potts-Kant, was arrested for embezzlement, Duke took a closer look at the researcher’s work. Fifteen of the researcher’s papers had to be retracted for unreliable data.

The FCA case against Duke was filed by biologist Joseph Thomas. According to Thomas, Duke was aware of the misconduct before the investigation and failed to inform the scope of what it knew to federal funding agencies. Additionally, Thomas alleges that Duke received 64 grants either based on or arising from the research of Potts-Kant. These grants totaled more than $200 million.

Because public universities are government entities, they may have some protection against FCA lawsuits; however, private universities do not. Private universities, like Duke, make up the top 25 recipients of federal funding for academic science. The FCA provides treble damages, meaning Duke could be forced to return three times the amount of funding it received from the 64 grants, totaling more than $600 million. Therefore, depending on how this case against Duke resolves, there could be a flux of FCA cases concerning academic research in the near future.

The complaint was filed by Joseph Thomas under the qui tam provision of the FCA. The qui tam provision enables individuals to file suit on behalf of the government when they are aware of fraud. These whistleblowers, also known as relators, are entitled to several incentives provided by the FCA. These incentives include protection against retaliation and 15 to 30 percent of the monies recovered by the government. In this case against Duke, Thomas could receive anywhere between $90 million to $180 million for his participation in the case.

Are you aware of fraud being committed against the federal government, or a state government? If so, the FCA can protect and reward you for doing the right thing by reporting the fraud. If you have any questions about whether you qualify as a whistleblower, please contact an attorney at Beasley Allen for a free and confidential evaluation of your claim. There is a contact form on this website, or you may email one of the lawyers on our whistleblower litigation team: Archie Grubb, Larry Golston, Lance Gould or Andrew Brashier.

Source: Science



We're here to help!

We live by our creed of "helping those who need it most" and have helped thousands of clients get the justice they desperately needed and deserved. If you feel you have a case or just have questions please contact us for a free consultation. There is no risk and no fees unless we win for you.

Fields marked    may be required for submission.
  1. I'm an attorney

Most of $3.7 billion in taxpayer recoveries in 2017...

Whistleblowers were responsible for nearly 92 percent of the $3.7 billion the United States government...

Whistleblowers expose illegal drug recycling in Penn...

The whistleblower complaints alleged that Med-Fast violated the False Claims Act by distributing and...
Whistleblower

CFTC whistleblower program finally gaining steam

Payouts of $45.5 million would be a record for the CFTC since its whistleblower program was created...

Is SCOTUS poised to limit SEC whistleblowers?

The Dodd-Frank Act defines a whistleblower as someone who tips off the SEC, and that is the narrow...

Failure to promptly disclose FCA lawsuit triggers...

The SEC filed the lawsuit against RPM International after the company violated antifraud regulations...

U.S. Supreme Court case shines light on fight against...

Regulations that offer whistleblower protections may be significantly limited during the U.S. Supreme...

Impressed with the Beasley Allen staff

I am very impressed with the Beasley Allen staff. They were very courteous and patiently explained the aspects of my claim in a way I could understand. If I ever have any need of an attorney in the future I will turn to Beasley Allen.

—Philip