log truck cab guard Cab guards: A historyA hundred thousand pounds of timber hurtles down the interstate alongside workers on their way to the office, families on their way to vacations and other commercial freight carriers delivering their loads. Log truck drivers charged with ensuring their timber’s safe delivery also have a huge responsibly to protect those with whom they share the road; however, few realize drivers themselves are often not properly protected from their cargo.

What is supposed to be protecting them? Cab guards. The shiny, metal pieces positioned behind the cab of almost every log truck in the United States are purchased with the belief they will protect from cargo shifting forward and crushing a driver’s cab during a crash. The earliest concept of a cab guard for heavy trucks, called a “truck driver protection shield,” dates back to at least 1960. The patent for the 1960 guard cites earlier designs for streetcar fenders and rail car guards as inspiration.

However, it wasn’t until the federal government and other interested parties began sponsoring and conducting research to evaluate the causes of heavy truck crashes in the ‘70s and ‘80s that cab guards truly made their way onto the manufacturing scene.

The studies found the primary contributing factors for truck fatalities were ejection and rollover, and determined the best way to help prevent deaths was to strengthen the structural integrity of the cabs. Manufacturing companies saw a niche they could fill, and cab guards’ popularity increased. Merritt Equipment Co. created the term cab guard and began manufacturing the product in 1972.

Ultimately, the tests from the ‘70s and ‘80s culminated in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) developing a regulation requiring cab guards on the back of large trucks and guiding minimum manufacturing standards, though implementation and compliance was largely left to the discretion of trucking companies. Unfortunately, those minimum standards did not work as intended.

“Instead of prompting manufacturers to exceed the minimum – as the auto industry did – cab guard manufacturers continued to only meet the bare minimum,” Beasley Allen lawyer LaBarron Boone, who handles cab guard litigation for the firm, said. “Once it was clear the minimum standards and cab guard requirements were not being used as intended, they were scrapped in 2004.”

The 2004 rewrite of FMCSA standards was prompted by U.S. House hearings called after nine cargo securement accidents occurred in New York between 1990 and 1993 with three fatalities. The North American Load Security Research Project was launched “to revise the regulations concerning protection against shifting and falling cargo for commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) engaged in interstate commerce,” according to the Federal Register on Dec. 18, 2000.

From the research project, new regulations were developed and took effect on Jan. 1, 2004. These new regulations switched the focus from vehicle crashworthiness to load securement, and do not include design or performance standards for cab guards – only for front-end structures, which are attached to trailers, not cabs, and have direct contact with the cargo.

Cab guards’ woefully inadequate design – using weak aluminum instead of a stronger metal like steel – remains as it was prior to 2004, further illustrating the minimum design standards of the past were not used as intended and cab guard manufacturers continue to risk lives with their products. In the coming weeks, we will highlight the devastating effects of defective cab guards and what can be done to protect people on America’s roadways.

* * *

For more information about cab guards and trucking injuries, contact LaBarron Boone in our Montgomery office at Labarron.Boone@beasleyallen.com, Chris Glover in our Atlanta office at Chris.Glover@beasleyallen.com, or call us at 800-898-2034.

Visit BeasleyAllen.com next Wednesday, June 21, for another installment in our Cab Guard Series.

Sources:
U.S. Patent
Federal Register
FMCSA – Cargo Securement Rules
Congressional Hearing – 1993



We're here to help!

We live by our creed of "helping those who need it most" and have helped thousands of clients get the justice they desperately needed and deserved. If you feel you have a case or just have questions please contact us for a free consultation. There is no risk and no fees unless we win for you.

Fields marked    may be required for submission.
  1. I'm an attorney

Heavy truck with a load of trees

Cab Guards: Continued risk

As Beasley Allen discovered through litigation, most cab guards would not stop one average-sized log...
Heavy truck with a load of trees

Cab guards: The deception

Because cab guards are marketed as effective at preventing drivers from being crushed by shifting cargo,...
Log truck with a cab guard

Sharing the road: be aware of dangers with large trucks

Truck driving consistently ranks among the deadliest occupations in the country, reports Trucks.com,...
Log truck with a cab guard

Cab guard case prompts warning labels on products

If “heavy truck cab guard” is searched on Google, more than 1.5 million results appear. And, at...
LaBarron Boone

Cab guard failure verdict highlighted on WSFA

Cab guards are required as front-end structures on 18-wheelers that pull flat beds, trailers and log...
Log truck with a cab guard

Jury finds for family of man killed in log truck crash

A jury in Lowndes County Circuit Court found in favor of the family of Larry Albritton, who was killed...

Highly recommended

I would highly recommend this law firm to handle any of your legal needs.

—Sandy