The Circuit Court of Barbour County, Alabama has recently certified a class action in a lawsuit that our firm Beasley Allen is handling against Community Health Systems, the previous owner of Lakeview Community Hospital, located in Eufaula, Alabama.

Allegations against the hospital overcharged uninsured patients for medical care and services as compared to patients of the hospital who have insurance. We will prove the hospital collects payments from uninsured patients that are hundreds times more than what they collect from insured patients.

The hospital takes the position that they must seek much higher reimbursement levels from uninsured patients because Medicare/Medicaid and private insurance carriers (such as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama) either pay less than the costs of rendering services or just above costs.

This case is similar to a number of other class actions filed against various hospitals around the country that are overcharging uninsured patients.

Many guilty hospitals have reached settlements in order to compensate the uninsured for overcharges, offer charity care to those patients who are unable to afford the hospital prices, and/or changed their hospital billing practices and charge uninsured patients at a more reasonable level and more in line with what government insurance programs and private insurance carriers are charged.

The defendants in the Lakeview Hospital case have taken the position that they do not believe their billing practices for uninsured patients are inappropriate. The class sought a court declaration that the hospital admission contract, which patients must sign upon entering the hospital, does not spell out a price term for services.

The law in Alabama states that where no price term is defined in a contract, the court can supply a reasonable price. Since Lakeview’s overall patient population consists of roughly 85% insured patients and 15% uninsured patients, the position of the class members is that “a reasonable price” is more along the lines of what 85% of the patients pay, not 15%. The plaintiff class asked the court to certify the class based on a formula that would set charges for medical services at 15% above costs. The court granted the plaintiff’s request and certified the class.

This is a great victory for the working poor of this state who are unable to afford decent health care coverage for their families. Jay Aughtman and Jere Beasley from Beasley Allen law firm, along with Walter Calton of Eufaula, will handle this most important case.



We're here to help!

We live by our creed of "helping those who need it most" and have helped thousands of clients get the justice they desperately needed and deserved. If you feel you have a case or just have questions please contact us for a free consultation. There is no risk and no fees unless we win for you.

Fields marked    may be required for submission.
  1. I'm an attorney

data security act

Data Security Act would rob consumers of access to...

The proposed Data Security Act of 2014, introduced in the U.S. Senate this week, appears to provide...

Beasley Allen attorney secures $2.3 million jury...

LEE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA – (April 2, 2012) Beasley Allen attorney William E. Hopkins, Jr., along...

Trial Court awards $38.2 million to the State of...

MONTGOMERY, ALA. (September 2, 2011) – Today Judge Thomas L. Zebert found in favor of the State of...

Attorney for victim of wrongful foreclosure turns...

After a Collier County, Florida, couple were the victims of a wrongful foreclosure, their attorney...

Looking for price gouging - check a gas station

Montgomery Advertiser columnist Josh Moon says while Alabama AG Luther Strange is concerned about price...

Target shorts customers on coupons, Beasley Allen...

A Jefferson County woman has filed a federal lawsuit against Target Corporation, claiming two area...

Wonderful to work with

Beasley Allen did a great job with my case. They were wonderful to work with. They were available by phone when I needed them, treated me with the utmost respect and worked hard on my behalf. If a need arises in the future, I would definitely call on them again.

—Geraldine